So what do we do? Delete all our content and report the page?
100 uploads
It’s getting hard to keep going like this; the feeds of top actresses are cluttered with repeated posts or a single 10-minute video chopped into multiple parts. When I post a new video, it ends up going unseen because of that—it’s really tough. Raising the minimum to 25 makes sense, but the rule about the 100 videos is truly discouraging.
The solution is simple: stop monetizing AI content. Instead, penalize those who upload spam, commit abuse, or reuse content by simply cropping it—cut their RPM so that, even if they generate thousands of views, they won't earn significant revenue. You could even send a notification requiring them to contact the administration for a review; if they are found to be at fault, you can take whatever action you deem appropriate. Just don't take away our ability to generate income by uploading content featuring new models—this income allows us to invest in creating new, high-quality content.
I think we need to remove ai slops like punishable offence if you upload ai slops anyways who enjoys ai content id rather watch hentai that's some peak animation
If that so, we think we only upload high earning models than new/mid models we like because of that limit. Now, its not good to add new model without earning.
Also we think now we upload 100 photos/videos only, 500 uploading limit per day gonna be useless i guess. I think also you should back the 10$ payout than 25$.
You'd be better off just adding a "delete all content" button, and we'll leave.
@admin@leakgallery Okay fine ! Let say we all agreed to have that top 100 of your was the solution to avoid spams and bots. But what is the reason why are you removing our upload that has 3k-8k views? While those top 5 creators who generate 300k views for just only 6-7 days were still there and were not removed. It seems that those top creators who got the highest views were just your propaganda a dummy account to entice othere creators to upload more views just to maybe test rheir luck. And here is the most questionable thing. I think 95% or the creators were protesting against the changes of the program. But those top creators? I've never seen their comments either. You don't have integrety guys that's the real slap on your faces. Making changes at the middle of the cut off? Your are just telling us that you dont have a plan to pay us according to our fair hard work. You dont have any intention to have a fair and balance order. You are just a clown. Trying to abuse people who tries to make a living. No help at all just a fraud anyways
@admin1 @leakgallery This is getting ridiculous. You suddenly put the top 100 posts limit and weekly ceiling in the middle of the week without proper notice. Many of us were already at good numbers and then everything got cut down. If you didn’t want to pay properly, you should have just said it clearly instead of giving fake reasons. You’re saying the changes are to reduce AI content, but at the same time your system is approving completely wrong models on wrong profiles. Photos of other girls are being approved under Mia Khalifa and random profiles. How is that controlling AI or improving quality? This looks less like “fighting AI” and more like just cutting creator payments while the site still makes money from ads and premium. Creators are the ones bringing the content and traffic. If you keep treating us like this, good uploaders will leave and the site will only have low-quality spam left.
No, we are not removing media because of the number of views they received. A media having 3,000, 8,000, or even 300,000 views is not, by itself, a reason for removal. We are also not using fake or dummy accounts as propaganda. The creators currently appearing on the homepage with significant numbers of views are real users, and they have every right to choose whether or not they want to participate in this discussion. They are not required to comment or express their opinion about the changes. With any change we make to the Creator Program, some creators will be happy and others will not. That is unfortunately unavoidable. When we make a change that benefits one group of creators, another group may feel negatively affected by it, just as you may feel satisfied with a change that another creator disagrees with. If the new Creator Program rules no longer suit you, you are of course free to stop uploading media. Other creators may decide that the new system works better for them and will continue to participate. That said, we do understand one of the main criticisms regarding the timing. We know that implementing this change during the current week, rather than at the beginning of a new week, was not ideal, and we are sorry for the impact this may have caused. We are still trying different ways to make the Creator Program better and find a system that works as fairly as possible for the community. We understand your frustration, and this change is not necessarily a permanent one. The Creator Program has only been running for almost one month, and we are still learning from the results and feedback we receive. We also recognize that the Creator Program has brought many genuine contributors to LeakGallery, and we absolutely recognize the value of that. However, we have also seen a much larger number of people using the program primarily to upload low-quality, repetitive, spammy, or AI-generated content simply to earn money. This has created a difficult balance for us to manage. At the same time, we know that some of the original contributors who have been adding content to LeakGallery voluntarily for a long time, without receiving any compensation, are now being affected by changes that were largely introduced to address this abuse. We understand that this can feel unfair, especially when you have been contributing to the platform long before the Creator Program existed.
We are taking all of this feedback into account as we continue to improve the program.
@leakgallery I’m trying to understand it, but what you’re doing makes no sense. It’s fine to look for ways to improve the site—and obviously, you can’t please everyone—but implementing this system only benefits the "clippers," which is precisely the group you’re trying to eliminate. The "clippers" will simply keep mass-producing clips from old videos until they get approved. In my opinion, a good solution to this problem would be to divide users into different tiers, with each tier offering distinct advantages regarding content uploads. You can’t compare content creators like us—who have put in the effort to create new profiles and source quality material—with those who constantly upload the same stuff about the site’s five most famous personalities (we all know who they are). I am fully convinced that I was one of the biggest contributors of new content; I tried to create as many profiles with quality material as possible. I spent over $40 to contribute more content (not that you are to blame for that expense), but it was all part of my effort to do a good job. Yet, you’ve decided the solution is to keep favoring those who upload the bare minimum content about people everyone already knows perfectly well—content that will obviously stop attracting new people.
We already know there are roughly 70 creators generating good weekly views; I don't think it would be that hard to divide us into tiers. After all, limiting it to just the 100 most-viewed posts per week is very restrictive, considering that all the content we’ve uploaded continues to generate views and revenue for you.
@leakgallery They could implement a creator level for content review. If this creator level is implemented, the update stating that "only your 100 most-viewed posts of the week generate revenue" could be bypassed. A module could be created that allows creators with the "content quality control" status to generate reports on specific content, flagging it as low quality, spam, re-uploaded clips from longer videos, etc. This content could be reviewed by several creators with that quality control status; if the majority considers it "garbage," it would be removed.
They should pay out normally this week—except for spammers and bot users—and could start using that new model next week.
This is completely unfair and unacceptable. You abruptly enforced a 100-upload cap mid-week after active contributors had already spent countless hours uploading under the existing framework. Because of this sudden shift, hundreds of thousands of legitimate views generated this week are essentially monetized by the platform for free while paying creators nothing. If curbing spam was genuinely your objective, this should have been scheduled from the start of a fresh cycle instead of penalizing honest creators midway through their work. Simply admitting that the timing "was not ideal" does not recover the revenue you took away. Please stop with generic responses and answer these directly:Are these 100-upload caps permanent, or will legitimate accounts be reviewed separately? Will the weekly ceiling be raised or removed for verified creators with established history? Do you plan to compensate for the views gathered before this rule was announced? Creators built your initial traction and library. Give us straight, transparent answers instead of telling us we are free to leave. @leakgallery @admin1
because of the sudden changes, we cant get the earning this week. what about reduce your maximum payout for the benefits to our work? so that we can get what we earned this week.
Like a lot of people has said here the 100 limit is only going to make people upload videos of the same 2-3 models that get the most views. Why upload photos or videos of models that give you 100 views per week if those views are not going to get paid while a few videos of those 2-3 models will give you loads of views? And also why upload more content when probably your 100 could be videos or photos that were uploaded weeks ago?
@leakgallery, @admin1, My suggestion are these: Regarding the video clips, why not set a specific rules on it? Like setting a minimum number of seconds/minutes. Regarding repetitive contents, you mention about specific moderation team assigned to them. What are they doing? Might as well focus on enhancing their capability to moderate. Whatever it is, as what I am seeing none of the creators benefits in your latest update. It is really inappropriate in my opinion more so you implemented it in the middle of the week. I hope this message is something that you can reflect on. I hope that you still reconsider your decision and we are here to give suggestions for the better, so this platform grows alongside the creators. Thank you.
So i has one good clip of a model but i needs minimum 5 clips to upload. It is the one of the worst feature i think. I only has one clip and it's latest clip. But it should minimum 5 clips needed to upload.. admin slove this issue also increase that minimum 5 to 10 atleast @leakgallery
